
It's thumbs down, Cp3.
Good move, David Stern.
A 3 team deal involving Hornets superstar Chris Paul was nixed today, per the Associated Press.
The NBA's League Office vetoed the deal after several owners questioned the deal's components. In the deal, the Lakers would have sent Pau Gasol to the Rockets, Paul would have gone to Hollywood, and Luis Scola, Kevin Martin, and Goran "The Dragon" Dragic would have been sent to New Orleans, alongside Lakers forward Lamar Odom.
The real winner here? New Orleans. For a rebuilding team, they would've hauled in the most talent, and the best cap flexibility. A nucleus of Odom, Scola, Dragic, and Martin wouldn't exactly be all-star quality per se, but, such would keep NOLA competitive out West. The Lakers would have mortgaged their entire stable frontline- with only the physically shaky Andrew Bynum remaining from the original cast of characters. Mike Brown seems to want to turn LA into a small ball team, and at this point in Kobe Bryant's career, I'm not sure if strategically, that is going to translate into another title run. Cap wise, dumping Gasol and Odom would give them enough space to pay Paul and extend him- with change left to grab an athletic, bench spark plug ala Brandon Roy. The Rockets would be able to unload cap room too, and would be able acquire an all-star center in the smooth Spaniard Gasol. From there, they can truly begin the rebuilding process.
On the veracity of the vetoing? I personally feel that the decision was legit, in that, the NBA had every right to stop a deal suspected to have been rooted in some form of collusion or rooted in some form of unfair coercion by one player (i.e. Carmelo Anthony). On the other hand, an argument can be made that this sort of voicing out of a desire to be dealt to a specific team happens all the time, and that it is impossible to execute deals of this nature of complexity without some discussions of specificity transpiring. The dice rolls more in the favor of the former, though, as in my view, it is better to be safe than sorry. The sure be no allowances made in regard to the collusion angle. It's an "all or nothing" situation. In the end, David Stern made the prudent choice- the right one.
The attention can now shift to possibly targeting Tyson Chandler, Dwight Howard, or Deron Williams. Same view applies, though. It is contingent on owners, and players themselves, to police what they make public, and what they keep behind closed doors. The Jason Kidd to Dallas deal from 3 years ago was a similar situation. Dallas' Mark Cuban was suspected of having colluded about throwing then Maverick Jerry Stackhouse into the mix, along with Devean George and cash. The deal fell apart, ironically, not because of the league office nixing it, but because of Devean George exercising his player rights/veto option.
Trades are complicated matters built on trust, potential talent, and most of all, potential financial flexibility. Free agency for the 2011-2012 season is compressed, and only looks to get more frantic as the days go by.
Stay tuned. The hits are surely set to keep coming in.
MC

