The Luka Doncic for AD trade has been analyzed to death already. It's one of those sports conundrums, however, that's akin on a really bad allergy- you just can't shake it.
On the surface, the exchange wasn't even as lopsided as say, the Gasol for Kwa-meh Brown and Javaris C. deal involving the Lakeshow back in 2008. Anthony Davis and Max Christie are NOT bottomfeeders. Not by a long shot. But the single draft pick? That could have been better. The CIA-ish, clandestine nature of how this deal came to be, coupled with the fact that it involved a franchise icon in Doncic, are what make this transaction head-scratching, infuriating to Mavs fans, and everyday stuff for the Lakers.
*Why deal Luka at his peak?
This is what makes things odd as heck. Out of shape? Maybe- a bit. A black hole on offense? A ball stopper? A traffic cone of D? All possible. Frightening to commit a $350 million supermax contract to the guy? Sure. No contract is devoid of risk. But what if the upsides outweighed said risks? What if you could deal with Luka's flaws just like the Lakers stuck by Kobe when he had legal troubles and Shaq when he was slacking off in the summertime, and just like (ironically) a previous Mavs ownership regime supported MVP Dirk Nowitzki after Dallas' 2006 and 2007 postseason meltdowns? Both as a Mavs fan and as longtime hoops follower, I probably would have still bet on Doncic over trading for an all-star who is older and more injury prone. $350 million is a lot of coin, but maybe then you could leverage your goodwill with Luka and work with him to build the roster further around his skills, and his paycheck.
A fellow Mavs fan once told me that star players the Mavs get rid of tend to do better during their next career stops. Exhibit 1A- Steve Nash and his stint in Arizona. I've also observed that Mavs teams of the past like to sign over-the-hill vets:
Eddie Jones
Elton Brand
Amare Stoudemire
Nick Van Exel
Jerry Stackhouse
etc.
Suffice to say, the Mavs front office has not always made the shrewdest choices- whether its been Cuban or DuMont at the helm.
No wonder fans are so upset. With Nico Harrison, we thought that things would be different, especially with auspicous moves such as the drafting on D-Live, and the acquistion of Gaff and PJ. He just threw whatever trust he had into the deep end of the ocean by dealing Luka to purportedly prioritize defense.
*So what now?
High drama all around. Luka in Hollywood will be box office. AD was amazing for three quarters in his debut. Now he's hurt and will be gone for a few weeks. Typical glassman. Typical AD. But hey, maybe Dallas ought to hire the training staff from the Phoenix Suns' Steve Nash era. Those guys took a battered, 31 year old Steve Nash (with tons of back issues) and got him to play many more seasons at a high level- and nab two MVP trophies in the process. Not bad.
As justifiably upset as they are now, Mavs fans ought to calm down just a wee bit, and channel their emotions towards supporting the city's embattled team. They have an injured list longer than the flying halfway around the world, and they're only 8th in the West. These guys need all the backup they can get.
If Davis (and Lively) can get right and maybe miss three to five regular season games after returning from his latest setback, I think Dallas cam catch the Clippers and get the 6th spot at best. At worst, I am thinking 8th or 9th. As a lower seed, I think Dallas would be best served playing Houston or Denver. Memphis and OKC will be too deep to overcome. The Lakers have a shallow bench, but a Luka out for blood would likely be able to kill Dallas in a seven game series.
The second half of the season should be a doozy.

